Writing Task
Topic overview
The Writing Task is the third module of the TARA: 40 minutes, ≤750 words, choose 1 from 3 questions. **It is not a free-form argumentative essay**—each question gives a 'statement' and requires you to answer in a fixed three-step format: ① explain the meaning of the statement; ② give a reasoned, well-supported argument against it; ③ discuss the extent to which you agree with it. UAT-UK does not mark it; the answer sheet is sent directly to institutions for reference. All three parts must be written fully; none may be omitted.
Key concepts
- Explain the meaning: in your own words, make clear what this statement is claiming, what the key terms mean, and under what conditions it holds. Don't rush to state a position.
- Construct the opposing argument: whether or not you agree with it, carefully construct the strongest possible argument against the statement (this is the step many people omit).
- Discuss the degree of agreement: weigh both sides and give how far you 'agree'—usually 'agree/disagree with qualifications', using 'in cases where…' to distinguish situations rather than making a blanket judgement.
Key points
- ◆All three parts are indispensable, and in particular do not omit the "counter-argument"
- ◆In the explanation section, first clarify the key terms and the conditions for their application
- ◆Express conclusions in conditional terms, avoiding all-or-nothing framing
40 minutes suggested: 5 minutes reading the question + listing points for the three parts, 30 minutes writing, 5 minutes checking. 750 words is the upper limit; you need not fill it—clarity > length. Use logical connectives (however / consequently / nevertheless) to signal the direction of the argument; no calculator/dictionary, so watch spelling and grammar.
Key points
- ◆First list points under the three headings 'explain/oppose/agree' before starting to write
- ◆Clarity and accuracy > piling on flowery language
- ◆Leave time to check grammar and spelling
- Missing the counter-argument: only explaining and stating a position, without seriously constructing the opposing side — an immediate loss of marks.
- Arguing without explaining: skipping the clarification of meaning makes the argument prone to going off track.
- Sitting on the fence without stating a position: the third step must give a clear 'degree of agreement'; it cannot be vague.
- Vague examples: one genuine, apt example is worth more than ten slogans.
Key points
- ◆All three steps must be present, and each must occupy a substantial length
- ◆Explain first, then rebut, then state your position — don't mix up the order
- ◆Support with concrete examples, do not just make empty claims
Worked examples
Try each example yourself before checking the explanation.
About 420 words, in a three-part format of "explain — oppose — discuss".
About 400 words, demonstrating the three-paragraph structure and "distinguishing between cases".
More TARA-style statement questions?
Ready to practise this topic?
Practise the available questions for this topic. Difficulty labels are platform references.
Practise Writing Task →